Consumers in Distress After Long Term Packs go Bust, Delhi HC Issues Stay on Trai Directive

Trai in its May 1 order had directed the DTH companies to continue providing long-duration packs to the subscribers, but Tata Sky has got a stay on this order from Delhi HC now

Highlights
  • The next hearing on the matter is now on July 11
  • The subscribers are now paying more for the same channels after their long-duration packs were revoked

The long-term packs in the DTH industry have become a cause of controversy lately. When the new regulatory framework by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) came into effect, it dismissed all the existing packs that the consumers were subscribed to, including the long-term packs and asked them to upgrade to the new channel packs. However, subscribers were enjoying these packs even before the new rules had come into play, and they were of the thought that these packs would continue to function the same until validity expired. As per a new ET report, Tata Sky, the prominent DTH provider, has managed to get a stay on the latest Trai directive about long-duration packs.

Tata Sky Argues Against Trai’s May 1 Directive

Many DTH consumers opted for such packs which came in quarterly, six-monthly and annual options, but after these plans were revoked, the customers felt cheated. When the new norms were implemented, and when these subscribers did not make any channel selections, they were automatically downgraded to the best-fit plans as directed by the sector regulator. These subscribers were of the thought that they would not have to pay anything extra until their plans were valid.

Later seeing the consumer sentiment, Trai issued a directive on May 1 ordering the DTH companies to honour the long-duration packs and continue providing this service if the consumer hadn’t selected channels. However, in a new development, Tata Sky has approached Delhi High Court and has managed to get a stay on this directive on Wednesday, and now the matter will be heard on July 11.

Consumers Now Paying More Because of New Directive

A senior executive in a DTH company said that the problem is multi-fold, he added, “At one end, Trai directed us to migrate all the consumers to the new regime or a ‘best-fit plan’ based on their existing packages, while after getting a backlash, it is now also asking us to honour the long-duration packs. This will create confusion.” The DTH operators have also highlighted that the new tariff regime has switched up the revenue sharing model as well, which now makes it almost impossible for the companies to provide 200-300 channels at the same cost.

Not only DTH providers, but broadcasters are also of the same opinion, as one of the major broadcasters said about DTH providers, “If they want to, or have to, give channels as per the old arrangement, they will have to shell out money from their pockets.”

Tata Sky argued in the court saying that Trai’s new directive contradicts its own framework and it would result in two parallel regimes, thus exposing the DTH companies to massive losses. The DTH provider highlighted that the regulator’s direction in February had asked to migrate all subscribers to best-fit plans in case they hadn’t made their selections. However, the new May 1 order reverses the stance on the previous order and contradicts it.

Read more on:

Arpit spends his day closely following the telecom and tech industry. A music connoisseur and a night owl, he also takes a deep interest in the Indian technology start-up scene and spends rest of his time spilling poetry and stories on paper.

1
Leave a Reply

avatar
Photo and Image Files
 
 
 
1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Venkatesan Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Venkatesan
Venkatesan

By all these measures, only the consumer is suffering. Now if one wants to subscribe to all available channels, the consumer has to pay a hefy amount due to this TRAI regulation. TRAI logic that one will not watch all available channel is ridiculous. I do not watch all the available channels, but I choose between all sports, entertainment, informatics, news, multiple languages channel as per my need. If I had to decide all the required channel for the entire family and subscribe to all the required channels We will end up paying more and this exercise itself time-consuming and… Read more »

Recent Posts

Reliance Jio Joins Other Telcos to Announce Tariff Hike In Coming Weeks

The biggest change that the telecom industry is going through right now seems to be on the tariff front. To...

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 vs Mi A3: Which Budget Smartphone is Better

Xiaomi is the ultimate smartphone winner in the market right now when it comes to buying budget or mid-range smartphones....

Xiaomi Mi Band 4i Teased By Xiaomi, Likely to Come With Tapered Features and Lesser Price Tag

This year Xiaomi has made some very successful releases in India, and that does not only mean smartphones. The Chinese...