Andrew Bonwick
Vice President of Product Development at Relm Insurance
Madhav Sheth
CEO of Ai+ Smartphone
Varun Kashyap & Sridevi Reddy
Co-Founders, Zithara.ai
Transforming Indian Offline Retail and Customer Engagement Using AI

In an industry-wide legal move, Reliance Jio Infocomm, the Mukesh Ambani led telco, and the Competition Commissions of India (CCI) pleaded the Supreme Court against the newly merged telco, Vodafone Idea and Bharti Airtel to probe cartelisation charges. However, as per the latest report, the apex court has dismissed the plea made by the newest telco entrant. Before reaching out to the Supreme Court, the Competition Commission had approached Bombay High Court where it had made the same please, but citing that there is already a sector regulator, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai), hence the body did not have the jurisdiction to do so, the Bombay High Court quashed the plea made by CCI.

Reliance Jio Gather Legal Action Against Incumbents
Last year in September, CCI had appealed against the three incumbent telcos on the grounds that they had denied interconnection points to Reliance Jio and thus based their argument of cartelisation over this fact. However, after being dissatisfied by the decision of Bombay High Court, the Mukesh Ambani led telco had to move apex court against the decision in January.
As per an ET Telecom report, an Apex Court bench, headed by Justice A K Sikri, who heard the plea, remarked, “We are upholding the order of the (Bombay) High Court on the aspect that the CCI could exercise jurisdiction only after proceedings under the Trai Act had concluded/attained finality, i.e. only after Trai returns its findings on the jurisdictional aspects.”
Further, supreme court bench turned the move made by CCI to be “premature” citing that the ultimate order given by the high court, quashing CCI’s order was not “liable to be interfered with.” In the matter, Bharti Airtel, which remains in direct competition with Reliance Jio, welcomed this decision, and was pleased by the decision of the apex court to “uphold the order of the Bombay High Court”.