BSNL Chennai Reaches Out to Authorities After Illicit Conduct by Aircel

Follow Us

BSNL has caught a whiff of fraudulent activities by the staff of Aircel and has taken the required step of going to the Telecom Enforcement, Resource and Monitoring (TERM) Cell in Chennai. BSNL is also seeking assistance from Trai and is planning to take the matter to the regulator if these illicit activities on Aircel’s part continue. The reason why BSNL had to approach the TERM is because they found a discrepancy in the numbers of subscribers which were transitioning to BSNL networks after Aircel stopped its services. BSNL has alleged that over 12 lakh plus customers have joined BSNL via portability, but many corporate customers, high billing individuals and CUG connections of corporate firms were prevented from joining the network by not providing them with technical assistance to do transition to BSNL.


S M Kalavathy, BSNL’s chief general manager also confirmed BSNL’s stance on the issue. “Private telecom players have involved in such activities, and we have raised the issue with the TERM cell. The response to BSNL is encouraging and we are looking forward to more customers as our billing and service mechanisms are transparent”.

V Sathiabalan, former telecom advisory member was of the same thought regarding the matter and gave voice to allegations too. He said “Customers of Aircel are not able to transfer their number to BSNL network. Mobile Number Portability was rejected three times by Aircel due to wrong UPC reason within a span of 30 days. Customer were forced to go to other private players by conspiracy”

As DC reported, many Aircel customers with CUG connection employed at a coal terminal in Ennore Port were to transition to BSNL networks using portability, but the staff who were responsible for the process made delays in the technicalities forcing the customers to opt for another subscriber.

Sathiabalan said that DoT should look into the matter and take stringent action two ways, firstly for the tactical delay which has caused unnecessary discomfort to the consumers and secondly for the loss which the government has borne because of this ordeal by Aircel. He also added that in a private sector company the complaint mechanism was hidden behind a ‘terms and conditions’ tag however such isn’t the case with public sector companies.

Reported By

Managing Editor

Chakri is a go-to guy for your next smartphone recommendation. Back in his engineering days, he used to play with smartphones by installing custom ROMs and that passion got him into the tech industry. He still goes nuts about a smartphone knocking his door for review. Currently managing everything at Telecom Talk, Chakri is trying to master PUBG Mobile in his free time.

Recent Comments

Rupesh :

Airtel and their love (greed) for tariff hikes is an old story that surfaces as headlines time and again. When…

Airtel Chairman Says its Time to Repair and Rationalise Tariffs:…

Faraz :

What about Jio Airtel, are they not giving above 50 Mbps? In Bihar Vi : 15 - 25 Mbps. Airtel…

Vodafone Idea to Raise Rs 20,000 Crore, Promoters to Pitch…

. :

Vi network seems already upgraded in most places, easily getting around 40 Mbps, equal to my fibre...

Vodafone Idea to Raise Rs 20,000 Crore, Promoters to Pitch…

Faraz :

Yeah ... They should cap at 40 Mbps only during night unlimited. Whole day it should be cap free or…

Vi Talks About Fundraising Yet Again, Will the Magic Happen…

Faraz :

Airtel needs to buy 5 MHz of n8 ( 900 MHz ) in all circles mentioned above. Also the spectrum…

Airtel Pays DoT to Continue Using Spectrum in Circles Where…

Load More
Notify of
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments