GSMA Urges Regulatory Parity Between Satellite and Terrestrial Telecom Services: Report

GSMA Urges Regulatory Parity Between Satellite and Terrestrial Telecom Services
The Global System for Mobile Communications Association (GSMA) has called for uniform regulatory treatment of satellite and terrestrial telecom providers, arguing that similar services must be governed by the same legal, economic, and tax frameworks. GSMA’s newly appointed Director General, Vivek Badrinath, emphasised that such parity is not merely a commercial requirement but an ethical imperative.

  • Make Telecom Talk My Trusted Source
  • Source of Google
  • Source of Google

Also Read: GSMA Urges India to Play Statesman Role in 5G, 6G Spectrum Strategy Amid 6GHz Delicensing

India’s Satellite Spectrum Debate Intensifies

“It is important for the quality of business that there should be fairness in the rules. If you’re providing similar services, you should have the same rules. Suppose you’re providing telecom-type services to customers. In that case, there’s no reason for mobile operators to have a more difficult set of hurdles, taxation and economic and legal conditions than satellite operators,” Badrinath told Moneycontrol in an interview. “Same service, same rules should be an ethical principle—it’s linked to the level playing field in business matters.”

COAI’s Stance on Satcom Recommendations

His remarks come amid escalating tensions in India’s telecom industry over proposed regulatory norms for satellite spectrum pricing. In a recent letter to the Department of Telecommunications (DoT), the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI)—representing Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel, and Vodafone Idea—strongly objected to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India’s (TRAI) recommendation of charging satellite operators 4 percent of adjusted gross revenue (AGR).

Calling the move “non-transparent based on non-justifiable assumption rather than factual data,” COAI told DoT secretary Neeraj Mittal that the regulator’s recommendations were not only inequitable but could also undermine the principles of the Telecommunications Act, 2023, and distort market competition.