Private 5G Networks Will Not Hamper Revenues for Telecom Operators, Says BIF

Ramachandran stated that Captive usage in the current situation would only contribute a minor share in processes/applications like robotics, automation, etc., due to challenges in delivering the required SLAs through public networks.

Highlights

  • The speculated loss in revenues for telcos via enterprise services is a misplaced one.
  • TRAI suggests administrative allocation of the 5G spectrum on demand for private enterprise networks.
  • TRAI suggests that private enterprises directly obtain a 5G spectrum from the government.

Follow Us

Private 5G Networks

The Broadband India Forum (BIF) in a statement has discredited the rumours suggesting that the telecom sector will witness a loss in revenues and has said that private 5G captive networks will lead to increased productivity for the enterprises and drive better revenues for the telecom service providers. The president of BIF, T V Ramachandran in a letter to Department of Telecommunications (DoT) secretary, K Rajaraman said that telcos will receive a good portion of the revenue from the private network services which will include voice and data communications.




TRAI’s Recommendations

According to a report from ET Telecom, Ramachandran stated that Captive usage in the current situation would only contribute a minor share in processes/applications like robotics, automation, etc., due to challenges in delivering the required SLAs through public networks. He added that because of this, the speculated loss in revenues for telcos via enterprise services is a misplaced one.

The recent recommendations provided by TRAI have been strongly opposed by the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) which represents Jio, Airtel and Vi. COAI has argued that allowing enterprises to set up private networks will kill the 5G business case for them. Recent recommendations from TRAI suggest administrative allocation of the 5G spectrum on demand for private enterprise networks through a publicised online portal-based process.

Telcos have stated that if the government accepts the proposal recommended by TRAI, the telecom operators could lose a huge chunk of revenue in their 5G enterprise endeavours. They put forward the case that revenue loss to such an extent won’t justify capital expenditure in setting up 5G networks. BIF which represents Cisco, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Facebook-owner Meta, Qualcomm and Intel among its key members, on the other hand, stated in the letter that A public telecom network set up by a telecom licensee would necessarily have to be one which optimises the various needs of a diverse population. It would be ‘tunable’ to a limited extent to meet specific enterprise ‘QoS’ needs.

The latest recommendations from TRAI on 5G pricing suggest that private enterprises directly obtain a 5G spectrum from the government and establish their own captive wireless private network (CWPNs), permission/license for which can be acquired via a "light touch' online portal-based regime."

Reported By

Anupam has been a tech enthusiast for a while and is always on the feet to know about the new launches whether it is smartphones or any other devices. He’s trying to share this passion with the help of his writing skills. Apart from these he’s also a pursuing freelance digital artist and loves creating artworks.

Recent Comments

Faraz :

Remember initially when Jio started their service of unlimited, FUP was 4 GB per day. In 2017, Jio completely removed…

Jio vs Airtel vs Vi ARPU Q2 FY25: Tariff Hikes…

Sujata :

Tariff restructure? Can you elaborate? Like what kind of tarrif you wanted/were expecting?

Jio vs Airtel vs Vi ARPU Q2 FY25: Tariff Hikes…

Sujata :

they're too lazy to do that.

Jio vs Airtel vs Vi ARPU Q2 FY25: Tariff Hikes…

Sujata :

Bro, Let's enjoy VI's slow and natural death!

Jio vs Airtel vs Vi ARPU Q2 FY25: Tariff Hikes…

TheAndroidFreak :

Off Topic: Motorola is planning to launch Hello UI 2.0 based on Android 15 along with Edge 60 Ultra (same…

OnePlus 13 and Xiaomi 15 to Feature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8…

Load More
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments