Experts opine: Mobile tower radiations are not harmful

Follow Us

Fears about the ill effects of EMF from mobile towers are founded and baseless. There is no reason for caution concerning ill effects on human health by electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation from mobile network towers in light of the fact that the standard limit embraced in India represents every natural impact of radiation.

tower-india




Truth be told, the standards set by India are much lower than the universally embraced suggestions of the International Commission on Non Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), which represent thermal and non-thermal impacts, said a report put together by a 13-member advisory board constituted by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) based on an Allahabad High Court request dated January 10, 2012.

The report categorically states ,”no definitive proof has been found on negative effects on human health by EMF radiation from mobiles or network towers by the World Health Organization (WHO)… (and) in as much as EMF radiation power levels in the region of base stations of cell phone towers are underneath as far as possible, there is no reason to be worried about the dangerous effects of radiation on humans which are living close to them".

Shripad Naik, Union Minister of State for Health and Family Welfare, addressed the media in April 2015 and clarified, “The Indian Council of Medical Research, the pinnacle body in India for the detailing, coordination and advancement of biomedical research, elucidated that there is no experimental confirmation demonstrating using cell phones will bring about mental or physical ailment."

Citing from the WHO factsheet:

  1. A man retains five times more RF from FM radio or TV than from base tower station.
  2. Holding a cell phone against the ear raises the cerebrum's temperature by under 0.1 degrees Celsius.
  3. RF exposure from base station is 0.002% to 2% of the worldwide standards set by ICNIRP.
  4. In spite of the fact that just a couple of epidemiological studies have been directed, there is no confirmation of tumours in youngsters.

From the existing body of work, it is clear from the existing council of research on mobile tower radiation that we can't trust the cases raised by individuals who are not specialists in the field of EMF. Unless we have conclusive evidence let us put our faith in baseless and hearsay facts about radiation and its effects.

Reported By

Telecom Analyst

Passionately following the Indian #Telecom Industry for over a decade from Business, Consumer and a Technical perspective. My primary focus area is Consumer & Digital Experience.

Recent Comments

shivraj :

hell yeah man ,if they offered 3.3TB on Airfiber i wouldnt have switched back to Local fiber internet

Jio Net Profit at Rs 6,861 Crore, ARPU Jumps to…

shivraj roy :

guys is there any noticeable quality difference with VoNR? VoLTE was a significant upgrade from 2G 3G calls wonder how…

Jio Confirms VoNR Deployment for 5G Users

TheAndroidFreak :

Off Topic : Samsung may have a ‘plan’ to beat Sony's iPhone camera dominance Samsung is working on a 3-layer…

OnePlus 13 and Xiaomi 15 to Feature Qualcomm Snapdragon 8…

Faraz :

AirFiber customers would have been more if their price was not equal to real fiber and if this 1 TB…

Jio Net Profit at Rs 6,861 Crore, ARPU Jumps to…

Faraz :

Best case Atleast 10 MHz sub-GHz (< 1 GHz like 700 or 900 MHz band) Atleast 20 MHz FDD midband…

Cabinet Approves Spectrum Refarming for 5G and Future 6G Services:…

Load More
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

21 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments