MediaTek’s roadmap leaked with a brand new 20nm octa-core SoC

Follow Us

Qualcomm and Samsung aren't the only ones who are working on new 64-bit mobile processors. MediaTek, the relatively low-cost SoC provider from Taiwan is also working on a brand new 64-bit mobile processor SoC. According to a newly leaked slide, which shows the company's 2015 roadmap, MediaTek is working on a new 20nm high-end chipset with LTE connectivity, though it hasn't been given a final model number yet.

MediaTek 2015 SoC Leak




The MT67xx chipset, which can be seen in the slide, will feature an octa-core 64-bit CPU, which is built using a 20nm fabrication process, along with LTE connectivity. In comparison, both Qualcomm and Samsung already have SoCs based on 20nm manufacturing process, which means that MediaTek is a full year late in releasing a competing SoC. Moreover, Qualcomm is on its way to develop their first SoC based on a relatively power-efficient 14nm FinFet process.

Other chipsets, which are showcased on the leaked slide, are the MT6735, the MT6735M, the MT6580, and the MT6570. The first two chipsets feature quad-core 64-bit Cortex A53 CPU built using 28nm LP, while the latter chipsets feature Cortex A7 CPU cores, and 3G connectivity.

Via 1, Via 2 | Source

Reported By

Computer science engineer turned technology blogger. Following consumer electronics industry closely from 2006, he can now predict pretty much where the market is heading. He has a dream to own Android, Windows Phone and iOS smartphones all at the same time.

Recent Comments

Sujata :

Yeah, use whatever works in your region. At the end of the day, we need reliable service, that matters the…

Vodafone Idea's Two Netflix Plans Available Today

Sujata :

Don't take risk, take j/a/v :D

Around 70,000 BSNL 4G Towers Out of 1 Lakh Are…

Riju vv :

More 4G towers are needed in Kerala, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu (I can't comment on the other circles mentioned above).…

BSNL to Deploy Additional 1 Lakh 4G Towers; Public Invited…

Load More
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments