Trai DTH Rule Changes: New NCF Channel Limit Might Not Benefit a Lot of People

Trai has introduced a new extended channel limit for the base NCF of Rs 130 allowing for 200 channels, but it could mean very little benefit for the consumers

Highlights
  • There are very less consumers who have close to 200 channels
  • Broadcasters are also hiking prices of some of their channels
  • The relief might be compensated by the hike of the pay channels

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) made some reeling change on the first day of the year. As the new year knocked its way into the people’s lives, so did a new change for the DTH industry as well. Under this new notification which Trai released on January 1, the telecom regulator announced a plethora of changes which will change how the industry is functioning starting March 1. The DTH operators have been given until the end of January to comply by these new rules and make the pricing changes which will fix some of the issues which the consumers have been facing in the DTH industry. The wake-up call for Trai came months later after the rollout of the Trai tariff regime last year after millions of subscribers complained that their monthly TV rental for DTH and cable TV services went soaring high. It was then that the telecom regulator decided to float a new consultation paper and hold an Open House discussion about what changes should be brought to the new Trai tariff regime. However, there seems to be a little catch about one of these changes.

trai-new-rules-ncf-benefit

The Story of Network Capacity Charge (NCF)

Trai in its mandate has said that now there is a massive change to how the Network Capacity Fees (NCF) is handled. It is worth noting that the NCF is the charge which is paid by the subscribers to the DTH operators for carrying the channels and makes up for one part of the total two parts of the DTH or cable TV bill which the subscribers pay every month. Until now, the NCF had been set at Rs 130 per month for 100 SD channels. On top of this, if the subscribers had to opt for additional channels, then they would have to spend Rs 20 for every additional 25 SD channels. Out of the initial 100 channels, 25 of them were occupied by the mandatory DD channels. As such, the subscribers were paying Rs 130 plus taxes for 75 channels. For the subscribers who had close to 200 channels, they had to pay around Rs 170 plus taxes.

With the new change, the subscribers would get 200 channels for Rs 130 plus taxes now and also the mandatory channels will not be counted in the NCF which the people will be paying. But, this brings us to another question that, back during the rollout of the Trai tariff regime, the regulator had urged to the public to opt for the channels which they only wanted to watch, and as a result, a lot of the subscribers out there have added minimal number of channels to their cart and subscribed to them. In such a case, the introduction of the NCF channel count extension makes little sense.

How It Affects the Consumers?

The move will only be beneficial for the people who have more than 100 channels subscribed on their account. Also, it would make very little difference close to Rs 20, for the people who have a little more than 100 channels, and less than 125 channels. The maximum benefit would be for the people who have got close to 200 channels because these people would be getting the slots for just double the number of channels. Even in that case, the broadcasters have decided to hike the prices of some of their channels which means that the NCF relief could come to mean very little if the subscribers opt for these channels and start paying for them since they have to pay the content cost for these channels anyway.

Read more on:

Arpit spends his day closely following the telecom and tech industry. A music connoisseur and a night owl, he also takes a deep interest in the Indian technology start-up scene and spends rest of his time spilling poetry and stories on paper.

10
Leave a Reply

Photo and Image Files
 
 
 
4 Comment threads
6 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Rajnish | Agra

Hmmm.

FB_IMG_1578486994053.jpg
Girish Gowda | BengaLuru

Last year the wolves didn’t come together because they knew it was loot time.
Now they get together to strategise how to scam people through media which excels in sympathizing with wolves.

Anish

Channels showing ads should be free. And there should be some regulation on those annoying watermarks as well. Sometimes, even the logos are annoying.

Girish Gowda | BengaLuru

Agreed.

Logos and watermarks are the absolute worst.

Recent Posts

BSNL Employees Demand Immediate Allocation of 4G Spectrum

State-run telecom operator BSNL’s employees during the hunger strike on Monday demanded immediate implementation of the revival plan, including 4G...

Realme Teases Smart TV, Smartwatch and New IoT Products; Fitness Band Launching on March 5

Even as Realme X50 Pro launched today, phone maker Realme is teasing more new smart devices as part of its...

Nokia 9 PureView Price Slashed by Rs 15,000, Now Available at Rs 34,999 on Flipkart

HMD Global’s flagship phone for 2019, the Nokia 9 PureView, has received a massive price cut in the Indian market....