Thailand Intends to Enable the Establishment of a Mobile Duopoly

True and DTAC together account for the bulk of subscribers in the Thai mobile market, with True holding a 34% stake and DTAC a 21% share. The market dynamics at play are still obvious and consistent, it is unclear exactly what it was looking for.

Most readers read for free. A small group from the TelecomTalk community keeps this going. Support only if our work adds value for you.

Highlights

  • Supporters reportedly threatened NBTC with legal action if it vetoed the move, which calls its independent regulatory authority into question.
  • The second and third national mobile players will apparently be allowed to join, effectively creating a duopoly.
  • Thai consumers were coerced into caving to their demands by some of the wealthiest citizens of the nation.

Follow Us

Thailand

The Bangkok Post reports that True and DTAC together account for the bulk of subscribers in the Thai mobile market, with True holding a 34% stake and DTAC a 21% share, respectively. The current market leader, AIS, now holds a 44% share. As might be expected, the regulator NBTC is attaching a tonne of conditions to the change, but they are unlikely to totally assuage those who deplore the decreased competition and customer choice that will arise from it. Concerns over the merger's potential effects surfaced as soon as it was originally suggested almost a year ago.




Additional Details Regarding the Collaboration

Everything started to look like it was settled by April, but by August, NBTC had decided it wanted to take a closer look. We can only assume that it aimed to improve the remedial measures, most of which appear to include price controls. However, given that the market dynamics at play are still obvious and consistent, it is unclear exactly what it was looking for. The second and third national mobile players will apparently be allowed to join, effectively creating a duopoly, according to the Thai telecoms regulator.

The arguments against the change remain, and the choice appears to be as much a surrender as anything else. The plan's prominent supporters reportedly threatened NBTC with legal action if it vetoed the move, which calls its independent regulatory authority into question, according to Nikkei Asia. The Thailand Consumer Council, on the other hand, appears to be planning to lodge a complaint. It appears very possible that this will turn out to be as much a political issue as a commercial or regulatory one. There will undoubtedly be some sort of public backlash if it appears that the authorities in charge of defending the interests of Thai consumers were coerced into caving to their demands by some of the wealthiest citizens of the nation. If the combination raises prices, the situation will only become worse.

Most readers read for free. A small group from the TelecomTalk community keeps this going. Support only if our work adds value for you.

Recent Comments

TheAndroidFreak :

Not by 2029. By 2032. Vi might use Tejas for 5G. That's why spectrum/fiber sharing between Vi and BSNL. BSNL…

Tejas Networks Did Not Have a Great 2026

Faraz :

All these plans are still good and cost less than 349 per 28 days. But why aren't there lower value…

Tariff Hike 2026: Vodafone Idea Cuts Benefits and Raises Prices…

JioLover :

No one is crying. Loss is part of business and most of the companies taken by big companies like Reliance…

Tejas Networks Did Not Have a Great 2026

AssaSingh :

Tejas just ruined BSNL 4G network forever. Didnot properly test the 4G Core with phones in India. Till date BSNL…

Tejas Networks Did Not Have a Great 2026

Faraz :

Remind me when was company profitable before BSNL order ?

Tejas Networks Did Not Have a Great 2026

Load More
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments