Qualcomm, Samsung Don’t Want Live TV Broadcasting Directly on Phones in India

The current devices aren't equipped with the said tech and any changes required would only push the costs upwards. The letter from the tech players suggests that they don't see any merits of such a move.

Most readers read for free. A small group from the TelecomTalk community keeps this going. Support only if our work adds value for you.

Highlights

  • Samsung and Qualcomm have opposed the idea of live TV broadcasting directly on smartphones in India.
  • Video consumption on smartphones is at its peak and it is what most of the mobile traffic is. To decongest the mobile networks, live broadcasting directly on smartphones is being considered by the government. 
  • Tech players said that live broadcasting directly to the phones would degrade the devices' battery performance and cellular reception.

Follow Us

qualcomm samsung dont want live tv broadcasting

Samsung and Qualcomm have opposed the idea of live TV broadcasting directly on smartphones in India. The Indian government is considering a policy which would push smartphone makers or Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) to equip their phones with hardware that will enable live broadcasting without the need to be connected to a mobile network. However, industry players including Qualcomm, Samsung, and other major names such as Nokia and Ericsson have opposed the move.




As per Reuters, in a joint letter to the communications ministry of India, these tech players said that live broadcasting directly to the phones would degrade the devices' battery performance and cellular reception. Further, the move would increase the cost of smartphones by up to Rs 2500. India is considering using ATSC 3.0 technology (quite popular in North America), to enable users to stream high-quality TV content directly on smartphones.

Read More - 5G Smartphone Shipments Reach a Record 58% Share in Q3 2023: IDC

The current devices aren't equipped with the said tech and any changes required would only push the costs upwards. The letter from the tech players suggests that they don't see any merits of such a move. Note that the government is still currently debating the policy internally and whether it would be implemented or not is not confirmed yet.

Video consumption on smartphones is at its peak and it is what most of the mobile traffic is. To decongest the mobile networks, live broadcasting directly on smartphones is being considered by the government.

Read More - 5G Subscriptions to Reach 5.6 Billion by 2030: Nokia

What Should Happen Here?

The tech bodies have already opposed the move, and another major thing for the government to consider is whether the consumers want it or not. If the consumers do not see any merit in the technology, then they would not want to pay more for it.

Most readers read for free. A small group from the TelecomTalk community keeps this going. Support only if our work adds value for you.

Reported By

Editor in Chief

Tanay is someone with whom you can chill and talk about technology and life. A fitness enthusiast and cricketer, he loves to read and write.

Recent Comments

AssaSingh :

Tejas just ruined BSNL 4G network forever. Didnot properly test the 4G Core with phones in India. Till date BSNL…

Tejas Networks Did Not Have a Great 2026

Faraz :

Remind me when was company profitable before BSNL order ?

Tejas Networks Did Not Have a Great 2026

lbp :

Air fiber will not die,after jio ends unlimited 5g mobile, both airtel vi will end nonstop 4g/5g mobile plans, companies…

Bharti Airtel Advises Customers to Opt for this Instead of…

User :

bsnl air fiber is also there not only jio and airtel. I have an idle sim so i am using…

Bharti Airtel Advises Customers to Opt for this Instead of…

Load More
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments