Airtel wants to take you to the dial-up Internet Era

Follow Us

Recently TRAI had sought comments for a draft direction on delivering broadband services in a transparent way. In addition, to seeking comments on transparency measures like clear information of tariff plans and timely usage alerts, there was a key element on broadband speeds -

ensure that download speed of broadband service provided to the fixed broadband subscriber is not reduced below 512 kbps in any broadband tariff plan




What caught our attention among the several comments was industry leader Airtel's. Airtel sought this change for the above direction -

Ensure that download speed of broadband service provided to the fixed broadband subscriber is not reduced below 64 kbps in case of Fair usage broadband tariff plan after expiry of assigned data quota of the customer.

This in our opinion is nothing but taking things to the pre-broadband or the dial-up era. What's more interesting is Airtel's rationale to seek the change. According to Airtel, some customers misusing minimum broadband speed provision and tending to overuse the data limit in their quota is the reason for increased broadband costs for everyone.

The story does not end here. There was a striking similarity in the AUSPI and COAI submission and Airtel's submission. It was more like the Airtel's demands become industry's demands. Refer screenshots -

AUSPI and COAI

13022016_21:31:24

Airtel

13022016_21:32:23

Our Take

It is unacceptable to seek a downgrade to 64 kbps. After all, it is the same providers who talk about next generation networks all the time. In contrast, TRAI must consider announcing the minimum broadband speed as at least 2 Mbps.

What about the minimum speed guarantee before FUP limit is surpassed? It is a fact that majority of the broadband customers (both wired and wireless) in India do not see promised speeds. Here is a classic case, again from an Airtel customer -

 

13022016_22:00:49

We find it unfortunate that ISPs in a bid to compete in terms of speeds promised extravagant speeds with a *up to* clause in small text.

Note: It is not necessary that all the comments would be implemented but if telcos had their way and we the citizens don't take part in the decision-making process we run the risk of losing out. Just like we all campaigned and made a positive impact on the net-neutrality front, let's keep our eyes open and act when the need arises. In this front, at TelecomTalk, we plan to play a more active role in the coming days.

Recent Comments

Rakesh :

Hey Jaganath, how is Vi network in Odisha? you getting 4g and Volte consistently? Are you having Odisha Vi sim?

BSNL Recently Added 350 4G Sites in Rajasthan

man :

yes jio is better in term of technology but airtel airfiber with dth combination is far better then jio in…

Reliance Jio Way Ahead of Competition in FWA Services

Pratul :

AirFibre speeds are not consistent, at times the speeds drop till 1-2 Mbps and it becomes painful to even browse…

Reliance Jio Way Ahead of Competition in FWA Services

jaganathsamal :

Yes same is with all operators sim. Primary sim gives more speed when the secondary one is disabled.

BSNL Recently Added 350 4G Sites in Rajasthan

T A :

Result of copying Airtel/Jio in price hikes but not in network quality. Vi still charges more than Jio but doesn't…

Jio Says Customer Addition Back to Pre-Tariff Hike Levels

Load More
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

51 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments