What must India learn from China Telecom Equipment ManufacturingIndia with more than 672 Million telecom subscribers has seen tremendous growth in the telecom sector.

  • Make Telecom Talk My Trusted Source
  • Source of Google
  • Source of Google

Entrepreneurship and Innovation have been two important pillars of development in this sector,but it has remained confined to services and business models and to an extend handset manufacturing.

Most of the telecom operators import virtually all the equipment for setting up a network.Moreover setting the 3G network will fuel demand for telecom equipment worth $70-$100 billion.

Most of telecom equipment would be import from Nokia Siemens Network, Ericsson, Motorola, Huawei and ZTR Corp and would greatly contribute to our export deficit.China was in a similar position a decade ago.

Today despite high entry barriers in the industry Huawei and ZTE from China are amongst some top telecom equipment manufacturers globally.China used market size and political will to get vendors to produce locally, create a supporting ecosystem and leverage its strength by taking following initiative:

• The Chinese government started like “China 863” program or state high-tech development plan to develop and test new technologies.

• Vendors like NSN and Ericsson were forced to manufacture locally with 95% local staff and content.

• Support was given to indigenous R&D by providing public funding, research grants and cheap loan from state owned bank.

• Huge amount of money was spent on research and patenting. As a result they defined their own 3G standards (TD-SCDMA) and thus developed their own system for manufacturing of network infrastructure and devices.

The Chinese government was also benefitted from the political environment, given that China government has share in most of the Chinese companies, they could force operators to use equipment manufactured by Chinese companies only. Also like India, Large subscriber base also helped. But it was the Government determination that ensured that even if the technology is not in the portfolio, it was developed in-house and produced. For ex China delayed the rollout of 3G until the domestic manufacturing competencies were developed inside the country.