Aircel Knocks on Supreme Court Doors Asking for Repayment of Rs 453 Crore from Airtel

Follow Us

Aircel, the bankrupt telco has moved Supreme Court to ask Airtel to pay a sum of Rs 453 crore for 4G spectrum purchased in 2016. The insolvent carrier owned by Malaysian Maxis has filed a petition in the Supreme Court for the same. It’s notable that post its bankruptcy, Aircel was caught in a tight spot because of lack of cash reserve and it wasn’t able to pay its 3,000 something employees. Citing this reason, Aircel said that the Sunil Bharti Mittal led telco is “illegally and unjustifiably withholding and enjoying” the amount which it owes to the company. The two petitions filed in the court will be up for hearing on August 17.

aircel-supreme-court-repayment-airtel




Two Petitions Asking Airtel to Pay Rs 453 Crore

Out of the two petitions filed by the insolvent telco, first one of them asks the former market leader to pay Rs 453 crore to the court or Aircel. The second one of them is about impleading Airtel in a case against the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) on the issue of government wanting bank guarantees from the telco before the time of 4G spectrum sale. In addition to the petition, the company has also remarked that Airtel should not “adjust, set off or appropriate any money payable” while repaying the sum of Rs 453 crore.

Aircel Deepens Allegations Against Bharti Airtel

Aircel said that Bharti Airtel is holding onto a large amount of cash with malicious intent. The telco said “Airtel entities are intentionally indulging in dilatory tactics with mala fide intention to usurp and misappropriate the Rs 453 crore,” further adding to its statement, the insolvent telco remarked that “(Airtel) cannot be permitted to retain the money as ill-gotten gains.”

When ETTelecom asked questions to Airtel, the telco replied: “We have not received any notice in this regard.”

The Controversy in Bird’s Eye

It is noteworthy that in 2016 to get the 4G spectrum deal done; Airtel had furnished three bank guarantees worth Rs 453 crore on behalf of Aircel after DoT demanded the same as a prerequisite for clearing the transaction concerning the 4G airwaves. Now Aircel has alleged that Airtel knows, without any cash flow the insolvent telco will be forced to liquidate its assets.

Aircel knocked the doors of the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) which directed that the condition raised by DoT was wrong and the bank guarantees should be returned to Aircel. However, since the bank guarantees have now lapsed, Aircel wants Airtel to make the payment in full with the pending amount summing up to Rs 453 crore.

Reported By

Managing Editor

Chakri is a go-to guy for your next smartphone recommendation. Back in his engineering days, he used to play with smartphones by installing custom ROMs and that passion got him into the tech industry. He still goes nuts about a smartphone knocking his door for review. Currently managing everything at Telecom Talk, Chakri is trying to master PUBG Mobile in his free time.

Recent Comments

Girish Gowda :

Oh hell no. Airtel 4G is literally unusable aside from a few posh locations in the city. My mother has…

Spectrum Auction 2024: DoT Excludes 700 MHz Frequency Band, Get…

TheAndroidFreak :

They haven't deployed band 1 10Mhz at most of the places. Don't expect much of the speeds you mentioned. 3G…

Spectrum Auction 2024: DoT Excludes 700 MHz Frequency Band, Get…

Rupesh :

An old saying, "A lie told hundred times becomes a truth." How many times times DoT penalised telcos in past…

Spectrum Auction 2024: Minimum Rollout Obligation for 5G Spectrum

Faraz :

Will they keep 26 GHz only for enterprises ?? I wonder when they will deploy it at market, shopping malls,…

India Spectrum Auction 2024: Details of Spectrum Put To Auction

airbird :

Then why i m getting high 5g speed in jio in comparison of airtel 5g..i checked it at diff location..

Explained: Differences Between 5G NSA and SA

Load More
Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments