Home > GENERAL > MOBILE NOS STARTING WITH ‘8′, SOON

MOBILE NOS STARTING WITH ‘8′, SOON

August 15th, 2009

By Duane B

Leave a comment Go to comments

8Mobile users across the country would soon see new mobile numbers, maybe as early as end of August 2009. While earlier reports indicated that all mobile users would be converted to a 11-digit numbering scheme (11 DIGIT MOBILE NUMBERS FROM 2010) latest updates indicate that 10-digit numbers would continue for more years to come.

While the DOT has almost exhausted its supply of available number series -

all levels from 90 / 91 / 95 / 96 / 97 / 98 / 99 have been allotted to various operators (and levels 92 / 93 / 94 reserved for Tata Indicom / Reliance Mobile / BSNL respectively) the new level “8″ would ensure that there are plentty of new numbering options available, with the existing 10-digit numbering framework. In short, the number “8″ would be introduced which would exist along with today’s mobile numbers starting with “9″.

Upcoming new “8″ level codes:

Code Operator Circle
8000 Reliance GSM Gujarat
8001 Vodafone West Bengal
8002 Airtel Bihar
8003 Airtel Rajasthan
8004 BSNL Uttar Pradesh (E)
8005 BSNL Uttar Pradesh (E)
8006 Vodafone Uttar Pradesh (W)
8007 Vodafone Maharashtra – Goa
8008 Airtel Andhra Pradesh
8009 Airtel Uttar Pradesh (E)
8010 Reliance GSM Delhi
8011 Airtel Assam
8012 Aircel Tamil Nadu
8013 Aircel Kolkata
8014 Aircel North East
8015 Tata DoCoMo Tamil Nadu
8016 Airtel West Bengal
8017 Vodafone Kolkata
8018 Airtel Orissa
8019 Tata DoCoMo Andhra Pradesh
8050 Tata DoCoMo Karnataka

To share an example: the old numbers 9xxxx-xxxxx would exist as well as new numbers 8xxxx-xxxxx. What does it entail? Well for starters those in search of VIP numbers can look forward to lots of new possibilities … Good news for telecom companies too as they can look forward to additional revenues in the form of “Premium Number” charges for VIP numbers!

Stay tuned to Telecom Talk for more updates.

Related Posts:

  1. LANDLINE SERVICE PROVIDER CAN NOT USE ‘95′ SERIES ANYMORE
  2. 11 DIGIT MOBILE NUMBERS FROM 2010
  3. GSM OPERATOR OPPOSE 11 DIGIT NUMBER PLAN
  4. TATA DOCOMO TO ROLLOUT IN MUMBAI ON AUG 6
  5. TATA DOCOMO CROSSES 5LAKH SUBSCRIBERS IN TAMILNADU
Categories: GENERAL
  1. naren
    September 2nd, 2009 at 23:34 | #1

    note no landline number starts with 8 so it wont create any probs…… 802,803,804,806 are not possible@saket

  2. Duane
    September 3rd, 2009 at 09:14 | #2

    @naren

    NAREN its not about landline numbers … its about STD CODE + LANDLINE numbers
    Bangalore landline nos are 080-2xxx-xxxx, 080-3xxx-xxxx, 080-4xxx-xxxx & 080-6xxx-xxxx. Hence the levels 802/803/804/806 cannot be issued for mobiles as persons calling from other states to those numbers would face issues as the calls may be routed to the Bangalore landlines (instead of mobiles) and THAT would create probs !
    >>note no landline number starts with 8 so it wont create any probs……

  3. Duane
    September 3rd, 2009 at 09:15 | #3

    @saket
    SAKET I guess the only persons who can answer your query would be the DOT as all series are issues by them, that too on a logic best known to them!
    >>how 8080 came to rcom maharashta??

  4. Duane
    September 3rd, 2009 at 09:18 | #4

    @DADA
    DADA .. most MSC (switches) of mobile networks connect to the 1st possible sequence. So if you dial 0-80234-56789 AND 080-2345-6789 it would ring on only ONE… here as both nos are 08023456789 the one 1st allocated (BSNL Lanldine) would ring, the second one would not .. this is why no 802/803/804/806 series mobiles can exist!

    >>Seems very2 interesting.Mob no(0)80234-56789 & one bangaluruan land line number (080)2345-6789.if I make a call that number from nagpur will phone number will be ring???

  5. Seema
    November 13th, 2009 at 19:11 | #5

    how do dial a karnataka airtel no starting with 8.
    i am dialing from maharashtra landline no, it says number does not exist.
    Please let me know the format of dialing the airtel no. starting with 8

Comment pages
1 ... 3 4 5 7742
  1. No trackbacks yet.